Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplant Proc ; 54(1): 15-17, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The initial objective of this study is to analyze the impact on survival of the preservation solution used. Secondarily, the influence of donor age, underlying pathology, and graft ischemia time is investigated. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analytical observational study has been carried out. A population of 1822 liver transplant recipients is studied in 4 Andalusian hospitals between 1995 and 2014. Survival of the patient and graft is analyzed by groups based on the conservation solution used, the age of the donor, the pathology indicated for transplant and the ischemia time, and the relationship between the variables through a bivariate study. A descriptive and predictive multivariate analysis of the variables was performed. RESULTS: Comparison of the graft and patient survival functions for each preservation solution did not differ significantly. The bivariate analysis shows a significantly higher utilization of Celsior and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution in graft loss. The comparison between donor age groups showed significant differences in favor of donor grafts younger than 50 years. In the multivariate analysis of patient and graft survival, the donor age obtained a hazard ratio of 1.008 (P < .005) with donors older than 47.6 and 47.5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Survival analysis between pathology groups found significant differences, not obtaining predictive power for patient or graft survival in the multivariate study. No significant differences were found in survival according to ischemia time, but there was a relationship between early graft loss and longer mean cold ischemia times up to 18 hours.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Soluciones Preservantes de Órganos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 697, 2019 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31387529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: S. pneumoniae is the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia in the solid organ transplant recipient (SOTR); nevertheless, the prevalence of colonization and of the colonizing/infecting serotypes has not been studied in this population. In this context, the aim of the present study was to describe the rate, characteristics, and clinical impact of S. pneumoniae nasopharyngeal carriage. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort of Solid Organ Transplant recipients (SOTR) was held at the University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain with the aim to evaluate the S. pneumoniae colonization and the serotype prevalence in SOTR. Two different pharyngeal swabs samples from 500 patients were included in two different seasonal periods winter and spring/summer. Optochin and bile solubility tests were performed for the isolation of thew strains. Antimicrobial susceptibility studies (MICs, mg/l) of levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, penicillin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, azithromycin and vancomycin for each isolate were determined by E-test strips. Capsular typing was done by sequential multiplex PCR reactions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors potentially associated with pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage and disease was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-six (5.6%) and fifteen (3.2%) patients were colonized in winter and spring/summer periods, respectively. Colonized SOT recipients compared to non-colonized patients were more frequently men (79.5% vs. 63.1%, P < 0.05) and cohabitated regularly with children (59% vs. 32.2%, P < 0.001). The most prevalent serotype in both studied periods was 35B. Forty-five percent of total isolates were included in the pneumococcal vaccine PPV23. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and macrolides were the less active antibiotics. Three patients had non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia, and two of them died. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumococcal colonization in SOTR is low with the most colonizing serotypes not included in the pneumococcal vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Nasofaringe/microbiología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Antibacterianos , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Vacunas Neumococicas , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Serogrupo , España/epidemiología , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/patogenicidad , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
J Hepatol ; 70(4): 658-665, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30582980

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although there is increasing interest in its use, definitive evidence demonstrating a benefit for postmortem normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) liver transplantation is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare results of cDCD liver transplants performed with postmortem NRP vs. super-rapid recovery (SRR), the current standard for cDCD. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study including all cDCD liver transplants performed in Spain between June 2012 and December 2016, with follow-up ending in December 2017. Each donor hospital determined whether organ recovery was performed using NRP or SRR. The propensity scores technique based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates across study groups; logistic and Cox regression models were used for binary and time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 95 cDCD liver transplants performed with postmortem NRP and 117 with SRR. The median donor age was 56 years (interquartile range 45-65 years). After IPTW analysis, baseline covariates were balanced, with all absolute standardised differences <0.15. IPTW-adjusted risks were significantly improved among NRP livers for overall biliary complications (odds ratio 0.14; 95% CI 0.06-0.35, p <0.001), ischaemic type biliary lesions (odds ratio 0.11; 95% CI 0.02-0.57; p = 0.008), and graft loss (hazard ratio 0.39; 95% CI 0.20-0.78; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The use of postmortem NRP in cDCD liver transplantation appears to reduce postoperative biliary complications, ischaemic type biliary lesions and graft loss, and allows for the transplantation of livers even from cDCD donors of advanced age. LAY SUMMARY: This is a propensity-matched nationwide observational cohort study performed using livers recovered from donors undergoing cardiac arrest provoked by the intentional withdrawal of life support (controlled donation after circulatory death, cDCD). Approximately half of the livers were recovered after a period of postmortem in situ normothermic regional perfusion, which restored warm oxygenated blood to the abdominal organs, whereas the remainder were recovered after rapid preservation with a cold solution. The study results suggest that the use of postmortem normothermic regional perfusion helps reduce rates of post-transplant biliary complications and graft loss and allows for the successful transplantation of livers from older cDCD donors.


Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Choque/fisiopatología , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto , Anciano , Cadáver , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Puntaje de Propensión , España
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...